<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzzgain &#187; Scoble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.buzzgain.com/tag/scoble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.buzzgain.com</link>
	<description>BuzzGain empowers you to “Do It Yourself PR”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who should you target as for PR efforts?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigaom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake McKee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremiah Owyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReadWriteWeb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scoble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venture Beat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If you are a Web 2.0 or a social software startup trying to either launch a product or your company, getting relevant Buzz or Press is absolutely important. Long known to be the most cost effective means to generate awareness among potential users, PR gives you the sense of “arrival”. Notice I said cost effective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you are a Web 2.0 or a social software startup trying to either launch a product or your company, getting relevant Buzz or Press is absolutely important. Long known to be the most cost effective means to generate awareness among potential users, PR gives you the sense of “arrival”. Notice I said cost effective NOT least expensive.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you have been in the market over the last 2-3 months you already know that the best Web 2.0 PR folks, like<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://pop-pr.blogspot.com/">Jeremy Pepper</a><span> </span>or<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.briansolis.com/">Brian Solis</a><span> </span>(Disclaimer: Brian’s a cofounder at BuzzGain) are either already taken, or they are very expensive (most charge $10,000 minimum per month, or freelancers who charge $5000 / month). So if you have read about<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" title="Do It Yourself PR" href="../do-it-yourself-pr">Do It Yourself PR</a><span> </span>and think that might be the best way to save some cash, the question becomes who (all) do you target to get good coverage.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">The usual answer I hear is<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a>. They are no doubt the best, but you cant put all your eggs in the TechCrunch basket. Make a good target list just like you would for potential investors or customers.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out these folks should be on your list (In no particular order).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">ReadWriteWeb</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.mashable.com/">Mashable</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/">Chris Brogan</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">4.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://scobleizer.com/">Scobleizer</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">5.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.communityguy.com/">Jake McKee</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">6.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.web-strategist.com/">Jeremiah Owyang</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">7.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.webware.com/">Webware</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">8.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.louisgray.com/">Louis Gray</a><span> </span>(Disclaimer: Louis is associated with BuzzGain)</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">9.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.gigaom.com/">Giga Om</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">10.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.venturebeat.com/">VentureBeat</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">The best case situation is to brief them all. But if you dont have time, (which is strange, but not out of the ordinary) then how would you select which ones to focus on? Also remember each of these folks likes exclusives, so it does not hurt to focus on a subset each time.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you follow the simple rule of thumb that you shoud focus on the ones with the most traffic to their site, I contend you will not have achieved your purpose &#8211; which is to get the MOST number of people to effectively have a chance to learn about your offering.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So what metrics do we apply? As we talked about<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="../?p=27">blog authority</a><span> </span>and influence before, there are a whole host of other criteria, but here are the 3 that I would consider the most important.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Sentiment</strong>: Of the lot, ReadWriteWeb, Mashable and Chris are the most positive. Their article sentiment ratio is around 50-65% &#8211; very high and even with things that are not great, they accentuate the positive.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Outlinks</strong>: The number of links back to your site will give you a chance to convert awareness from PR into “potential leads” or prospects. The best link to post ratio (# of links per post) come from Louis, VentureBeat and GigaOm.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Engagement</strong>: Thanks to tagging, bookmarking, sharing Google feeds, tweeting, etc. you have the potential to reach a larger audience than visitors to your blog. So this extended audience should be counted into the overall metric for an individual’s reach. For extended reach Scobleizer, Chris and Louis are the best. Not only do they have a great number of followers on Twitter, friendfeed, delicious, etc., but their users are more engaged, clicking on links sent by these three than others.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So, if you had to make a call on exclusives, no doubt, focus on Rafe Needleman, Om Malik, Michael Arrington. Your best bang for the buck (for actual users) might come from some of these others.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of technology tradeshows, 2009 and beyond</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-future-of-technology-tradeshows-2009-and-beyond/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-future-of-technology-tradeshows-2009-and-beyond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crunchies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacWorld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scoble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SXSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Over 3500 people who attended tradeshows last year were asked “Why do you go to a trade show?”
The top 3 reasons they gave were: a) To keep up with industry trends b) Learn about new products / companies / technologies and c) Network
When asked why they would not attend one in 2009, I was half [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-44" title="080104-ces-hmed1p.hmedium" src="http://news.buzzgain.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/080104-ces-hmed1p.hmedium-300x204.jpg" alt="080104-ces-hmed1p.hmedium" width="300" height="204" /></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Over 3500 people who<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.tsnn.com/">attended tradeshows last year</a><span> </span>were asked “Why do you go to a trade show?”</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The top 3 reasons they gave were</strong>: a) To keep up with industry trends b) Learn about new products / companies / technologies and c) Network</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">When asked why they would not attend one in 2009, I was half expecting a) Economy b) Lack of budget and c) All of the above.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Instead we heard: a) Lack of networking opportunities b) Ability to follow the show “remotely” without going there (leveraging Twitter / Ustream.tv, etc) and c) Not a good ROI on time investment.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So what’s changing with technology trade shows?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Smaller more focused shows</strong>: Clearly<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.techmeme.com/081216/p85#a081216p85">Macworld</a>, CES, Comdex and others<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://scobleizer.com/2008/12/16/are-bloggers-social-networks-killing-the-big-shows/">are under transition</a>. From the one size fits all environment, we are moving towards conferences around a specific niche &#8211; usually driven by the passion of one individual OR Bar Camp style open format highly interactive sessions. In 2009 we suspect shows like Web 2.0 Expo will see fewer folks attending and more likely the show being split into multiple niche shows. The exception is SXSW which is more like a</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Networking</strong>: Many conferences and tradeshows now offer networking opportunities leveraging Facebook fan pages or event pages for attendees to network before and after the show. Which helps, but the hallway conversations are where relationships are built, which makes the case for more BarCamp style unconferences.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Learning moves to the web</strong>: Waiting for one day in the year to learn about the latest and greatest in the industry in an era of bloggers, Twitter and viral videos is just not feasible. Expect more “How to” and “Success Stories” or “How we did that” type sessions in these conferences and fewer “Here’s the next big thing” or the “State of the industry” type sessions.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So then what are the implications?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Local tax revenue drops</strong>: This is an obvious one. While conferences generate good sized (100 &#8211; 1000) type crowds,<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2008/02/25/daily21.html">local tax revenues at convention sites will drop significantly</a><span> </span>thanks to the drop in # of 10,000+ attendee trade shows. Local bars and pubs should still do okay, but hotels and convention sites will probably be in for a rough time. SXSW has a $110M impact on Austin. That’s bound to get a reset.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Rise in speaking engagements opportunities</strong>: There will be a lot more opportunities for speakers with experience “doing” something as opposed to “preaching” something to do. Expect fewer of the Gartner, Forrester analysts heading sessions, unless they have practical industry experience and working experience.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Rise of the show built around a narrow niche</strong><span> </span>(like blog networks): Related bloggers and blogs will network together to host an event around a specific niche. Its more viable now and more profitable with smaller audiences and better networking opportunities.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Do you think we got the main implications right? What else do you see happening?</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-future-of-technology-tradeshows-2009-and-beyond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

