<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzzgain &#187; Public Relations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.buzzgain.com/tag/public-relations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.buzzgain.com</link>
	<description>BuzzGain empowers you to “Do It Yourself PR”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why dont technology startups leverage PR even if its more effective?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/why-dont-technology-startups-leverage-pr-even-if-its-more-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/why-dont-technology-startups-leverage-pr-even-if-its-more-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogger Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shift Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Defren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Our good friend Todd posted a very good piece on how PR helps raise venture capital. In it, he quotes a survey from BIGfrontier Communications that has the following statistics:


Startup companies that engage in PR campaigns are 30% more successful in getting funding within one to three months than those that don’t.
Forty-four percent of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Our good friend Todd posted a very good piece on how<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="../*%20Startup%20companies%20that%20engage%20in%20PR%20campaigns%20are%2030%%20more%20successful%20in%20getting%20funding%20within%20one%20to%20three%20months%20than%20those%20that%20don%27t.%20%20%20%20%20*%20Forty-four%20percent%20of%20the%20respondents%20who%20used%20PR%20outreach%20received%20funding%20in%20the%20one-to-three-month%20time%20period%20versus%2014%%20of%20those%20that%20did%20not.%20%20%20%20%20*%20Seventy-eight%20percent%20of%20respondents%20who%20said%20PR%20helped%20in%20their%20funding%20efforts%20are%20planning%20to%20use%20some%20of%20their%20VC%20dollars%20for%20additional%20PR.%20%20%20%20%20*%20Ironically,%20the%20survey%20also%20found%20that%20only%2018%%20of%20the%20300%20startups%20surveyed%20had%20a%20PR%20program%20in%20place%20during%20the%20funding%20process.">PR helps raise venture capital</a>. In it, he quotes a<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.pria.com.au/news/id/560">survey</a><span> </span>from<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.prweekus.com/Study-finds-PR-aids-startups-funding-efforts/article/121318/">BIGfrontier Communications</a><span> </span>that has the following statistics:</p>
<ul style="margin: 0px 0px 16px 20px; padding: 0px;">
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #e0e0e0; margin: 20px; padding: 8px 8px 8px 15px;">
<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">Startup companies that engage in PR campaigns are 30% more successful in getting funding within one to three months than those that don’t.</li>
<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">Forty-four percent of the respondents who used PR outreach received funding in the one-to-three-month time period versus 14% of those that did not.</li>
<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">Seventy-eight percent of respondents who said PR helped in their funding efforts are planning to use some of their VC dollars for additional PR.</li>
<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">Ironically, the survey also found that only 18% of the 300 startups surveyed had a PR program in place during the funding process.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So it begs the question why dont startups employ PR as a marketing strategy early as they can? Or why dont they hire a PR agency quicker?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Running a startup myself and having a background in Marketing, I can tell you my main reasons are the following:</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">PR is not easy</strong>. Putting an ad campaign on Google for paid adwords is dead simple. Buying a target email list is relatively easy. Putting together an email campaign (or a poorly conceived spam campaign) is easier. Attending a trade show and putting together a booth to attract customers is easier than having to build relationships with reporters and bloggers. PR depends on people. Other marketing forms are dependent on money and processes. Entrepreneurs who have a background in technology prefer working with things that are predictable (since everything else about the startup is unpredictable).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">PR takes time.<span> </span></strong>That’s the one thing entrepreneurs and smaller companies dont have enough of. Yes, everything takes time and there’s a return on time (ROT, not ROI) and PR does provide a great return on time.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Only if you have done it before<span> </span></strong>can you navigate the landscape. Most first time entrepreneurs have not.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">3. Hiring a PR agency is “expensive”.<span> </span></strong>The average quote from any good PR agency you’d get for even a 2-5 person startup is $10,000 a month in Silicon Valley. I can do a Google ad words campaign with less than $100 budget per month. Here’s the funny part: If that becomes $300 budget daily, that’s as much as PR. But its in bite-sized chunks.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">4.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">PR requires specialists</strong>. The first marketing hire is paid to “put together a website, manage a trade show booth”. There are not enough qualified PR individual consultants to help smaller companies with smaller budgets.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">5.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">PR is not tied to the lead generation process or the board level agenda.<span> </span></strong>PR generates awareness and that’s not easily accountable. In my board meeting every month, I get asked about my lead generation funnel. Never have I been asked to show the recent press clips about the company.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Finally, making your mark through the noisy world right now is tough. There are innumerable startups in any given field and there’s way too much noise with multiple companies providing the same message and solutions. Given that reality, how is spending on PR justified if you are going to be yet another startup in the crowd?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Having identfied the reasons why entrepreneurs dont invest in PR, we’ll follow this up with possible solutions for how the PR world can adapt to the challenge in a future post.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/why-dont-technology-startups-leverage-pr-even-if-its-more-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the BuzzGain Blog</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/welcome-to-the-buzzgain-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/welcome-to-the-buzzgain-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BuzzGain is a disruptive media engagement solution to help companies and individuals to “Do it yourself PR (Public Relations)”. Our online solution helps discover, engage, analyze and report on their PR outreach efforts in an actionable fashion. This reduces costs of PR by at least 60%.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;">BuzzGain is a disruptive media engagement solution to help companies and individuals to “<a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" title="Do it yourself PR" href="../do-it-yourself-pr">Do it yourself PR</a><span> </span>(Public Relations)”. Our online solution helps discover, engage, analyze and report on their PR outreach efforts in an actionable fashion. This reduces costs of PR by at least 60%.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/welcome-to-the-buzzgain-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Reads for Jan 5th: Magazine Ads, Digital Influence</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-5th-magazine-ads-digital-influence/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-5th-magazine-ads-digital-influence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
1. NYtimes: Magazine sport fewer ad pages this January than usual.
January issues tend to be thin even in good years, and most magazines posted a decline in ad pages. But the average decline across all monthly magazines was only 17 percent, and most Condé Nast magazines fared much worse, according to analysis of Media Industry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<p>1. NYtimes: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/business/media/05adco.html?_r1&amp;ref=business">Magazine sport fewer ad pages</a> this January than usual.</p>
<blockquote><p>January issues tend to be thin even in good years, and most magazines posted a decline in ad pages. But the average decline across all monthly magazines was only 17 percent, and most Condé Nast magazines fared much worse, according to analysis of Media Industry Newsletter data.</p>
<p>Wired, which is usually thick with consumer electronics ads, was the worst hit, down 47 percent from a year ago to 43.6 ad pages. Architectural Digest fell 46 percent, to 63.2, from 116.8. Vogue and Lucky were both down about 44 percent.</p></blockquote>
<p>2. John Bell: The <a href="http://johnbell.typepad.com/weblog/2008/08/revised-the-13.html">13 Skills of the Public Relations Pro</a> of the Future</p>
<p>Marketing and public relations are coming together. PR is growing as an industry while “traditional” advertising &#8211; what ever that is &#8211; remains flat. Still, we have taken no new ground in ‘measurement’ and articulating the tremendous ROI of P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-5th-magazine-ads-digital-influence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Do It Yourself PR?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-to-do-it-yourself-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-to-do-it-yourself-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do It Yourself PR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
There are several articles on how to Do It Yourself PR. I read one by Jimmy this morning most of which can be attributed to Jason Calacanis. There are several tactics to DIY PR, but there are 3 main strategies that we recommend.
1. Listen: Pick the topics / categories, areas of interest in your field [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>There are several articles on how to <a href="http://www.buzzgain.com/">Do It Yourself PR</a>. I read one by <a href="http://eastcoastblogging.com/2008/09/05/startups-do-it-yourself-pr/">Jimmy</a> this morning most of which can be attributed to <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/8/jason-calacanis-on-how-to-get-pr-for-your-startup-fire-your-pr-company">Jason Calacanis</a>. There are <a href="http://www.cheaprevolution.com/the_cheap_revolution/2008/03/15-do-it-yourse.html">several</a> <a href="http://www.zeromillion.com/marketing/public-relations.html">tactics</a> to DIY PR, but there are 3 main strategies that we recommend.</p>
<p>1. <strong>Listen</strong>: Pick the topics / categories, areas of interest in your field and listen to what’s being said by key influencers &#8211; these include reporters, journalists, analysts (like Gartner, etc.) bloggers, micro-bloggers, video-bloggers, podcasters, and photographers.</p>
<p>After you listen for about a day you’ll get a picture of who’s who (or the landscape) in this space.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Learn</strong>: Pick about 20-30 of these influencers and get as much detail about them as possible. What do they write about? When do they write? Who is their audience? What do they care about? What topics interest them? What are unique stories you can tell them about your startup?</p>
<p>3. <strong>Engage</strong>: Attend relevant events that your influencers go to. There’s no substitute for face-to-face discussions. Commenting on blogs is the best way to make the initial engagement. Write and manage your blog by “joining the discussion”.</p>
<p>The key is discipline and making sure you do it consistently. You need to show and see results, but dont expect to get written up on the WSJ within a week of starting this process.</p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.makingthemodernworld.org.uk/">http://www.makingthemodernworld.org.uk</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-to-do-it-yourself-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolving from a PR/Social Media conversation to a business conversation</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/evolving-from-a-prsocial-media-conversation-to-a-business-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/evolving-from-a-prsocial-media-conversation-to-a-business-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Van Grove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Bloggers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The only qualification I have to make this blog entry is that I have been a VP of Marketing before and have managed a annual PR budget of about $1.2 Million. I dont claim to know the business of PR well, but when has that stopped a blogger from giving his opinion right?
The question I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>The only qualification I have to make this blog entry is that I have been a VP of Marketing before and have managed a annual PR budget of about $1.2 Million. I dont claim to know the business of PR well, but when has that stopped a blogger from giving his opinion right?</p>
<p>The question I want to address though is one asked by my friend <a href="http://www.jennifervangrove.com/2008/09/29/why-should-i-take-the-time-to-build-relationships-with-bloggers-who-dont-have-a-ton-of-readers/">Jennifer</a> and another PR professional <a href="http://imseekingbalance.blogspot.com/">Michelle</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Where do you think that line should be drawn? Subscribers? Alexa rankings? Google page rank? Technorati? Which bloggers make the list of desirables? Tell me…”</p></blockquote>
<p>The question is one of which bloggers should you target &#8211; the “A list” ones with many readers or the other list &#8211; who have very little readership.</p>
<p>I think the question fundamentally should be a different one.</p>
<p>Web masters in the late 90’s (every marketing team had one remember), have now evolved into Internet Marketing functions whose role includes SEM, SEO, site design, buying optimization etc.</p>
<p>The PR professional has to go away from answering the question “How can I generate the most Buzz” to “<strong>How can I impact the marketing goals &#8211; be it for a company or a client</strong>“? Many smart PR professionals are already doing this.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Buzz question prompts you to look for more PR mentions, or get your CEO on the cover of Forbes or get mentioned in EVERY local newspaper.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Impact question begs you to measure the net result or “<strong>ROI of that buzz creation</strong>” to the bottom line. What that means is that you have to come with reports not that state the # of mentions and press clips of every mention, but reports that indicate “What % of the registered users came because you got a mention in a blog” Or “What was the conversion ratio for prospects when we got a mention on NYTimes vs. the Wall Street Journal”. I am the first to tell you that this is difficult currently to do, but you have to get there.</p>
<p>If you set out to address that question however and you are convinced that’s the way to go, then you’ll spend your time on 3 metrics through the customer acquisition pipeline:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Awareness generation</strong>: How many people were made aware of your products / offerings? This could be a simple case of taking the # of publications and bloggers you pitched to &amp; got written up in and adding them up. Its not a great number but its a start. This is what you are probably most familiar with.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Actionable intent</strong>: How many people visited your website after that mention in that blog OR media publication? This is MORE possible to do now than ever. Granted you wont get EXACT metrics, but you will get close enough numbers. Become friends with you web analytics person and they’ll give you a good start.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Converted prospects</strong>: How many people from the previous number actually performed the call to action. This is also an important metric to track. Again this metric is being tracked by the analytics tools &#8211; you just need to be more familiar with them.</p>
<p>You need these three numbers because only then is it possible to justify your time spent on bloggers outside the “A list”. Why?</p>
<blockquote><p>Its is our contention that the conversion ratio (# of people visiting to taking action to converting) is BEST in the niche blogs. Their audience is specific, tailored and is passionate about the only thing that blogger covers. That blogger usually has a GREATER influence over his niche audience than a blog network does.</p>
<p>Second, niche bloggers are more likely to give you good links that will improve the organic ranking of website in Google searches. This is huge since organic traffic is literally “free” or minimal cost to your company.</p></blockquote>
<p>The large A list blogs and blog networks give you great traffic (i.e. awareness) BUT the conversion ratios are correspondingly poor.</p>
<p>You can argue if conversion ratios matter. That’s question #2.</p>
<p>It does. The  reason it matters is the MOST EXPENSIVE method to generate leads and conversions currently is Google SEM (Or Search Engine Marketing) or Pay Per Click (PPC) as they call it in the industry. As an alternative organic search results (which are obtained with more links to your website and good content) are a lot less expensive.</p>
<p>So if you can prove (with real reports and numbers to your VP Marketing) <strong>that you can generate better conversion ratios and deliver leads at a lower cost</strong>, you will never have to justify talking to B list bloggers or justify your engagement with any type of social media.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/evolving-from-a-prsocial-media-conversation-to-a-business-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Moral and Ethical dilemma of blogger relations: Email Addresses</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-moral-and-ethical-dilemma-of-blogger-relations-email-addresses/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-moral-and-ethical-dilemma-of-blogger-relations-email-addresses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogger Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vocus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Lets talk about the age old question about the differences between bloggers and journalists from the main stream media. First a categorization. To us there are 3 broad categories of people you can target to generate buzz.
1. Main stream media &#8211; journalists, reporters, freelancers, editors and publishers of magazines, newspapers, radio, TV, etc. These professionals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Lets talk about the age old question about the differences between bloggers and journalists from the main stream media. First a categorization. To us there are 3 broad categories of people you can target to generate buzz.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1. Main stream media &#8211; journalists, reporters, freelancers, editors and publishers of magazines, newspapers, radio, TV, etc. These professionals are paid to learn and write about news and happenings. Our main competitors including<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.whatsnextblog.com/archives/2007/05/vocus_demonstrates_how_to_screw_up_blogger_relations.asp">Vocus</a><span> </span>and<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://gettingink.typepad.com/getting_ink/2008/07/just-because-yo.html">Cision</a><span> </span>(and smaller ones like<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.burrellesluce.com/">Burrelles Luce</a>) provide extensive information on over 40,000 of these professionals with their media database offering. Any media database has typically information about the publication, its reach, the beat the reporter covers and the reporters contact information (email and in some cases phone).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2. Blog Networks &#8211; Since early part of this decade, online publications that started as small one person blogs such as GigaOm and TechCrunch, now have multiple writers and editors with a fairly similar agenda to the main stream media but a focus on specific content such as startups (e.g. Paid Content) or social media (e.g. Mashable). The writers for these have a revenue (and hence pageviews, readership) goal either via sponsorships and advertising so they are also “pitched” by PR professionals. Some of these professionals<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://gigaom.com/contact/">encourage and love</a>having their contact information available online (providing an easy way for potential PR professionals to contact them) and others<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://escherman.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/how-many-pr-companies-have-a-data-governance-strategy/">dont like</a><span> </span>being “<a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.itjournalist.com/?p=25">spammed</a>” with irrelevant pitches.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3. Independent bloggers &#8211; These are the mostly one person industry experts &#8211; Some of them love to have people email and contact them about new products and services &#8211; e.g.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/index.html">Louis Gray</a>, (disclaimer: he’s helping us) and<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.churchofthecustomer.com/blog/2008/03/out-of-vocus.html">others feel its spam</a>.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Our customers prefer to have the contact information for all of the folks in our database. We have about 80% of our targets mapped to email and phone, but we are choosing in our present version to NOT show direct contact information for the individual bloggers until we are certain they are not going to be used for<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2007/10/sorry-pr-people.html">sending useless PR pitches</a>and get<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://pr.typepad.com/pr_communications/2008/05/are-media-datab.html">blacklisted</a>.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">We currently allow our customers to comment on their blogs or news sites, but do offer contact information for the main stream media.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">What’s your suggestion for the best way to encourage engagement between these 3 categories of influencers and the best way for our customers to get access to them?</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-moral-and-ethical-dilemma-of-blogger-relations-email-addresses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 tips on how to get a mention on Fortune, Forbes and Business Week</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/3-tips-on-how-to-get-a-mention-on-fortune-forbes-and-business-week/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/3-tips-on-how-to-get-a-mention-on-fortune-forbes-and-business-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogger Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The top 3 business publications in the US are Business Week, Fortune and Forbes.
A quick comparison of their circulation, unique visitors, online revenue and editorial staff is below. The interesting question raised by 247Wall Street is when do these publication die? Their models seem doomed if you consider cost of printing, editorial payroll costs and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The top 3 business publications in the US are Business Week, Fortune and Forbes.</p>
<p>A quick comparison of their circulation, unique visitors, online revenue and editorial staff is below. The interesting question raised by<a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/05/03/the-sun-sets-on-businessweek-forbes-and-fortune/"> 247Wall Street is when do these publication die</a>? Their models seem doomed if you consider cost of printing, editorial payroll costs and the steep decline in advertising.</p>
<p>Leaving aside whether they survive for a minute, lets focus on how you as a business can get a mention or get written up in these publications.</p>
<p>1. <strong>Pick the right reporter based on topic</strong> <strong>of interest</strong>: Notice the editorial staff on each of these publications. You can use<a href="http://www.buzzgain.com/"> BuzzGain to get the exact writer / reporter / journalist</a> to cover your story or you can go to their <a href="http://mediakit.businessweek.com/pdf/mediakit_print.pdf">editorial pages</a> and get the entire editorial staff and contact them directly. The important thing is there are over 200 to 400+ reporters on staff. Just because they are a business magazine does not mean everyone cares about startups in the Web 2.0 space.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Focus on obtaining an online mention versus a print mention</strong>: Clearly the total circulation of these publications is individually about a million and readership about 2-3 million. Compare that to the total number of unique visitors on a monthly basis which is anywhere between 3-5 million. Why is this important? An online mention is more easily actionable &#8211; they can search and visit your website. In addition if the article provides a link to your website your chances of Search Engine Optimization improves.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Learn more about the reporters past writing style, story angle and suggest follow up pieces to previously written articles.</strong> The total number of links to articles written by other writers in this publication compared to the number of outgoing links is very high. This means most business reporters are linking to their own pieces instead of referring to other blogs, web sources. The more you can “link” stories they have previously written about to the story you are trying to pitch them, the better chance you have of getting your story written.</p>
<p>What’s worked for you with business press? Have you got a mention? What tip would you suggest?</p>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; height: 67px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="680">
<col style="width: 62pt;" width="82"></col>
<col style="width: 50pt;" width="66"></col>
<col style="width: 59pt;" width="79"></col>
<col style="width: 52pt;" width="69"></col>
<col style="width: 70pt;" width="93"></col>
<col style="width: 58pt;" width="77"></col>
<col style="width: 41pt;" width="55"></col>
<col style="width: 72pt;" width="96"></col>
<col style="width: 57pt;" width="76"></col>
<col style="width: 52pt;" width="69"></col>
<tbody></tbody>
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt; width: 62pt;" width="82" height="17"></td>
<td style="width: 50pt;" width="66">Circulation</td>
<td style="width: 59pt;" width="79">Editorial Staff</td>
<td style="width: 52pt;" width="69">Pageviews</td>
<td style="width: 70pt;" width="93">Unique Visitors</td>
<td style="width: 58pt;" width="77">Owner</td>
<td style="width: 41pt;" width="55"></td>
<td style="width: 72pt;" width="96">Ad Page Decline</td>
<td style="width: 57pt;" width="76"></td>
<td style="width: 52pt;" width="69">Online Rev</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">Business Week</td>
<td><span> </span>900,000</td>
<td align="right">220</td>
<td><span> </span>18,000,000</td>
<td><span> </span>3,300,000</td>
<td>McGraw Hill</td>
<td align="right"></td>
<td align="right">38%</td>
<td></td>
<td><span> </span>19,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">Fortune</td>
<td><span> </span>1,020,000</td>
<td align="right">320</td>
<td><span> </span>61,000,000</td>
<td><span> </span>4,900,000</td>
<td>Time Warner</td>
<td align="right"></td>
<td align="right">38%</td>
<td></td>
<td><span> </span>40,000,000</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">
<td style="height: 12.75pt;" height="17">Forbes</td>
<td><span> </span>900,000</td>
<td align="right">460</td>
<td><span> </span>66,000,000</td>
<td><span> </span>5,600,000</td>
<td>Private</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/3-tips-on-how-to-get-a-mention-on-fortune-forbes-and-business-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

