<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzzgain &#187; Print media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.buzzgain.com/tag/print-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.buzzgain.com</link>
	<description>BuzzGain empowers you to “Do It Yourself PR”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Top 5 changes newspapers will adopt in 2009, and how to use it for your benefit</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/top-5-changes-newspapers-will-adopt-in-2009-and-how-to-use-it-for-your-benefit/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/top-5-changes-newspapers-will-adopt-in-2009-and-how-to-use-it-for-your-benefit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Its no secret that newspapers and print publications are having a rough time adapting to social media and citizen journalism. Its fairly simple to see the equation to get better (but a whole lot difficult to implement) from a business standpoint. Thanks to market forces the revenues are lower and expenses are higher.
How does a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Its no secret that newspapers and<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.paidcontent.co.uk/entry/419-why-the-nail-is-in-newspapers-coffin-for-2009/">print publications are having a rough time<span> </span></a>adapting to social media and citizen journalism. Its fairly simple to see the equation to get better (but a whole lot difficult to implement) from a business standpoint. Thanks to market forces the revenues are lower and expenses are higher.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">How does a newspaper get revenues higher? &#8211; diversify sources of it -<a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=42000">besides advertising<span> </span></a>(print or online) and classifieds.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">How do you cut costs? &#8211; remove print and reduce staff (journalists).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So what changes can we expect in 2009? Newspapers will:</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1a. Partner with bloggers (experts) to create highly specific content for niche reader and layoff reporters / journalists. The bloggers themselves will be initially “paid” for with increased “readership” and a “platform to create their personal brand”. I expect it will be 2011 or 2012 before these bloggers they recruit will actually be paid for in cash.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1b. Create regional networks of citizen-reporters ( a-la About.com circa 1999) to source local content from local providers. This is a no brainer. The outsourcing of local content is already taking place to highly sub-regional or mini-metro self-employed or unemployed<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www3.flickr.com/photos/vinu/sets/72157610144709049/">citizen reporters</a>.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2. Abandon the print edition for subscribers and make print only for off-the-rack purchases (albeit more expensive).<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/1029/p25s01-usgn.html">Print is on its way out</a>. I expect more publications to abandon print (citing green credentials, high costs, etc). The ones that will print will take their “best of online content OR create a custom bind for racks &#8211; which will be distributed primarily to airlines, hotels, etc. for off rack purchases.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3. Remove wire service (AP, Business Wire). This also<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-tribune-considers-dropping-ap-wire-service-within-two-years-report/">already happening</a><span> </span>in the “cut costs” bucket.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">4. Use their “objective” nature to rate local providers and adopt the “Angie’s list” type model for recommending local services. This falls in the increase revenue bucket. Another example of such a service is Yelp (restaurant recommendations). I expect newspapers to start partnering with crowd sourcing content providers to generate hyperlocal “community of interest or location” type services.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Really understanding what services are required by “local” users that they are willing to pay for and provide those. “Pay per action” model will be a big beneficiary.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">5. Be a provider of demographic data and detailed local information to marketers. Newspapers will be more willing to sell their treasure-trove of information about local readers and help marketers in their campaigns.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">What do you think? Am I a missing something?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Image credit:<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="./Top%205%20changes%20newspapers%20will%20adopt%20in%202009,%20and%20how%20to%20use%20it%20for%20your%20benefit%20%20%20BuzzGain_files/phoenix_rising.jpg">J Fortune on Photobucket</a></p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/top-5-changes-newspapers-will-adopt-in-2009-and-how-to-use-it-for-your-benefit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Reads for Jan 5th: Magazine Ads, Digital Influence</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-5th-magazine-ads-digital-influence/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-5th-magazine-ads-digital-influence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
1. NYtimes: Magazine sport fewer ad pages this January than usual.
January issues tend to be thin even in good years, and most magazines posted a decline in ad pages. But the average decline across all monthly magazines was only 17 percent, and most Condé Nast magazines fared much worse, according to analysis of Media Industry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<p>1. NYtimes: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/business/media/05adco.html?_r1&amp;ref=business">Magazine sport fewer ad pages</a> this January than usual.</p>
<blockquote><p>January issues tend to be thin even in good years, and most magazines posted a decline in ad pages. But the average decline across all monthly magazines was only 17 percent, and most Condé Nast magazines fared much worse, according to analysis of Media Industry Newsletter data.</p>
<p>Wired, which is usually thick with consumer electronics ads, was the worst hit, down 47 percent from a year ago to 43.6 ad pages. Architectural Digest fell 46 percent, to 63.2, from 116.8. Vogue and Lucky were both down about 44 percent.</p></blockquote>
<p>2. John Bell: The <a href="http://johnbell.typepad.com/weblog/2008/08/revised-the-13.html">13 Skills of the Public Relations Pro</a> of the Future</p>
<p>Marketing and public relations are coming together. PR is growing as an industry while “traditional” advertising &#8211; what ever that is &#8211; remains flat. Still, we have taken no new ground in ‘measurement’ and articulating the tremendous ROI of P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-5th-magazine-ads-digital-influence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

