<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzzgain &#187; Jeremiah Owyang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.buzzgain.com/tag/jeremiah-owyang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.buzzgain.com</link>
	<description>BuzzGain empowers you to “Do It Yourself PR”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who should you target as for PR efforts?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigaom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake McKee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremiah Owyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReadWriteWeb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scoble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venture Beat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If you are a Web 2.0 or a social software startup trying to either launch a product or your company, getting relevant Buzz or Press is absolutely important. Long known to be the most cost effective means to generate awareness among potential users, PR gives you the sense of “arrival”. Notice I said cost effective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you are a Web 2.0 or a social software startup trying to either launch a product or your company, getting relevant Buzz or Press is absolutely important. Long known to be the most cost effective means to generate awareness among potential users, PR gives you the sense of “arrival”. Notice I said cost effective NOT least expensive.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you have been in the market over the last 2-3 months you already know that the best Web 2.0 PR folks, like<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://pop-pr.blogspot.com/">Jeremy Pepper</a><span> </span>or<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.briansolis.com/">Brian Solis</a><span> </span>(Disclaimer: Brian’s a cofounder at BuzzGain) are either already taken, or they are very expensive (most charge $10,000 minimum per month, or freelancers who charge $5000 / month). So if you have read about<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" title="Do It Yourself PR" href="../do-it-yourself-pr">Do It Yourself PR</a><span> </span>and think that might be the best way to save some cash, the question becomes who (all) do you target to get good coverage.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">The usual answer I hear is<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a>. They are no doubt the best, but you cant put all your eggs in the TechCrunch basket. Make a good target list just like you would for potential investors or customers.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out these folks should be on your list (In no particular order).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">ReadWriteWeb</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.mashable.com/">Mashable</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/">Chris Brogan</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">4.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://scobleizer.com/">Scobleizer</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">5.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.communityguy.com/">Jake McKee</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">6.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.web-strategist.com/">Jeremiah Owyang</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">7.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.webware.com/">Webware</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">8.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.louisgray.com/">Louis Gray</a><span> </span>(Disclaimer: Louis is associated with BuzzGain)</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">9.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.gigaom.com/">Giga Om</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">10.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.venturebeat.com/">VentureBeat</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">The best case situation is to brief them all. But if you dont have time, (which is strange, but not out of the ordinary) then how would you select which ones to focus on? Also remember each of these folks likes exclusives, so it does not hurt to focus on a subset each time.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you follow the simple rule of thumb that you shoud focus on the ones with the most traffic to their site, I contend you will not have achieved your purpose &#8211; which is to get the MOST number of people to effectively have a chance to learn about your offering.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So what metrics do we apply? As we talked about<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="../?p=27">blog authority</a><span> </span>and influence before, there are a whole host of other criteria, but here are the 3 that I would consider the most important.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Sentiment</strong>: Of the lot, ReadWriteWeb, Mashable and Chris are the most positive. Their article sentiment ratio is around 50-65% &#8211; very high and even with things that are not great, they accentuate the positive.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Outlinks</strong>: The number of links back to your site will give you a chance to convert awareness from PR into “potential leads” or prospects. The best link to post ratio (# of links per post) come from Louis, VentureBeat and GigaOm.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Engagement</strong>: Thanks to tagging, bookmarking, sharing Google feeds, tweeting, etc. you have the potential to reach a larger audience than visitors to your blog. So this extended audience should be counted into the overall metric for an individual’s reach. For extended reach Scobleizer, Chris and Louis are the best. Not only do they have a great number of followers on Twitter, friendfeed, delicious, etc., but their users are more engaged, clicking on links sent by these three than others.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So, if you had to make a call on exclusives, no doubt, focus on Rafe Needleman, Om Malik, Michael Arrington. Your best bang for the buck (for actual users) might come from some of these others.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retweet on Twitter: The ripple effect of the echo chamber</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/retweet-on-twitter-the-ripple-effect-of-the-echo-chamber/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/retweet-on-twitter-the-ripple-effect-of-the-echo-chamber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremiah Owyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retweeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Retweet Want to really estimate the power of an influencer &#8211; good,bad and otherwise? Lets take a case study.
Our friend Jeremiah Owyang, digital media influencer and analyst at Forrester posted a blog entry on Retweet and the power of word of mouth. To summarize:

[Information within Microblogging communities like Twitter encourage rapid word of mouth –of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div id="attachment_164" style="width: 310px;">Retweet Want to really estimate the power of an influencer &#8211; good,bad and otherwise? Lets take a case study.</div>
<p>Our friend <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/">Jeremiah Owyang</a>, digital media influencer and analyst at Forrester posted a blog entry on <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/11/23/retweet-the-infectious-power-of-the-word-of-mouth/">Retweet and the power of word of mouth</a>. To summarize:</p>
<blockquote>
<h2>[Information within Microblogging communities like Twitter encourage rapid word of mouth –of both positive and negative content]</h2>
</blockquote>
<p>In the post he talked about how information spreads quickly with Retweets. Essentially on Twitter if you “RT” or “ReTweet” someone you repeat what they say presumably because you agree or disagree with them OR if you want it to be amplified to your audience of followers on twitter.</p>
<p>Using BuzzGain we tracked usage of the Retweet before and after Nov 23rd. About 16,500 twitter users follow Jeremiah and so his influence in twitter is relatively large.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>After Nov 23rd usage of Retweet among the top 50,000 Twitter users has increased by ~7%.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Great you think, Jeremiah well done.</p>
<p>Not exactly. I will chalk this as a not so positive trend. Why?</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>If you drill down deeper, tweets with negative sentiment (we measure sentiment as positive, negative or undetermined) has 45% more retweets than positive or neutral ones.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This is consistent with <a href="http://www.diaryofaprflack.com/2008/04/bad-news-about.html">the view that bad news travels faster than good</a>. This may also be primarily because of the <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=Mumbai+OR+mumbai">Mumbai blasts </a>and it could be an anamoly I agree, but you cannot equate a Retweet to someone linking to your blog on a post. How is retweeting different then?</p>
<p>1. <strong>Immediacy</strong>: Given the real time nature of twitter versus the 3-5 min it takes to blog link to someone, the amount of <strong>time to think, process and react </strong>to what’s being said is a lot less. If you tweet information that’s not factual or plain incorrect the person retweeting has a lot less time to fact check.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Value add</strong>: In most blog posts that link back to a post (including ones that just provide a list of links with delicious tags for example) there is a sense of “aggregation” or value add to the post. In most posts with link back there’s a lot more <strong>value add in the form of a different opinion or counter example</strong>. With Retweets, there’s ZERO value add. Its a plain and simple echo. You can argue there’s value in an echo, but I think its useless for most parts.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Reinforces a heard mentality. </strong>Retweets are an inaccurate measure of ripple effect. On average less than <strong>0.35% of the top 50,000 twitter users posts are retweets</strong>. So it should have a relatively small effect right? No. Unfortunately, even though the <strong>next 350,000 followers </strong>of the top 50,000 are smart, connected, and influential individuals in their own right, <strong>their retweets to posts is close to 0.7%. </strong>Think about it. Double the top 50,000. This is a herd mentality pure and simple.</p>
<p>Do I think retweeting is going away. No.</p>
<p>Do I think its a measure of Word of mouth influence. Maybe.</p>
<p>Do I think it complicates the measure of word of mouth online to a point of making it useless. Absoutely.</p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.wikipedia.com/">Wikipedia</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/retweet-on-twitter-the-ripple-effect-of-the-echo-chamber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

