<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzzgain &#187; engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.buzzgain.com/tag/engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.buzzgain.com</link>
	<description>BuzzGain empowers you to “Do It Yourself PR”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How many twitter followers does it take make an impact?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-many-twitter-followers-does-it-take-make-an-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-many-twitter-followers-does-it-take-make-an-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This post primarily discusses corporate uses and engagement with Twitter, unlike how most people use it to keep up with friends and discuss “What are you doing”? The # of companies on twitter is growing dramatically from fewer than 5 in 2007 to over 500 in 2008.
Given that twitter has about 1.3 million registered accounts, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>This post primarily discusses <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/9/twitter-s-corporate-users-get-a-new-marketing-tool">corporate uses</a> and <a href="http://www.briansolis.com/2008/03/discovering-and-listening-to.html">engagement with Twitter</a>, unlike how most people use it to keep up with friends and discuss “What are you doing”? The # of companies on twitter is growing dramatically from fewer than 5 in 2007 to over 500 in 2008.</p>
<p>Given that twitter has about 1.3 million registered accounts, the question we get asked frequently is:</p>
<p><em>&lt;Update&gt;: <a href="http://blog.stratiusgroup.com/">Jason</a> asks where we got the 1.3 Million number vs. 3.1 reported by TwitDir. Two items: 1) We only track accounts that have more than 5 friends and at least 10 tweets. We think these are real users vs. bots. If we did all accounts, we track about 3.27 Million. Bottom line there are a TON of fake accounts on twitter. </em></p>
<p><em>2) We also did this initial run in July. We’ll update for September, but we doubt There were 1.5+M accounts added in 2 months.</em></p>
<p>&lt;End Update&gt;</p>
<blockquote><p>“So if I get on twitter and make a lot of “friends” will our messages get propagated faster?”.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is usually by a corporate client, who does not have a basic understanding of twitter or has just heard that twitter helps you get “Buzz”.</p>
<p>Usually we have to go over basics of twitter and community with them before they ask the next question:</p>
<blockquote><p>“So how can we can get the key influencers to follow us and tweet about?”.</p></blockquote>
<p>Another discussion ensues and topics such as engaging users and not spamming them comes up. They usually look a little lost at this point, but are able to somewhat relate to email spam so they eventually get it.</p>
<p>The next question comes up within the 30 minutes of discussion:</p>
<blockquote><p>“So how many people have to follow us for our message to be heard?”.</p></blockquote>
<p>We’re not sure if you really want to answer this question, but its a worthwhile exercise. There are varying degrees of influence on twitter. We define 3 types of twitter engagement. Each of these types of engagement is an increasing amount of influence obviously:</p>
<p>1. Another twitter user follows you (and based on her tweet history) <strong>tweets at about the same time </strong>as you do. Else if you are in different timezones, your influence on that person is lesser.</p>
<p>2. A twitter follower replies to your tweets (@replies) with a certain frequency. Or <strong>the # of @ replies </strong>you get as a twitter user.</p>
<p>3. A twitter follower <strong>retweets your tweets with some frequency</strong>.</p>
<p>There are 3 things that stand out when you analyze twitter statistics.</p>
<p>1. The top 250 twitter users (with the most number of followers, the most number of friends (people they follow) and the # of tweets) carry an inordinate amount of “influence”.</p>
<p>2. The average number of followers for the top 100 twitters is 9304, with the top at about 93,000 followers and #100 at about 6300 followers.</p>
<p>3. If you have less than 100 followers (with some exceptions), which over 500,000 users on twitter do, your influence rank drops to less than 8 (give time zone considerations). Meaning less than 18 people are really viewing your tweets, which indicates 4 of them are likely to @ reply and 1 is most likely to retweet.</p>
<p>The graph below shows Twitter influence. The top 100 users carry 65% of the influence on twitter and they have a minimum of 6300+ followers to a maximum of ~90,000 followers. Users from 100-5000 have 22% of twitter influence and so on.</p>
<p>Some questions:</p>
<p>1. Corporate clients still believe the best use of twitter is to leverage it as “yet another channel” for their message amplification. What are the best techniques you have used to convince them about the value of engaging their customers on twitter?</p>
<p>2. How are you recommending your clients engage with twitter users?</p>
<p>3. What’s the best example of large companies engaging on twitter?</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-many-twitter-followers-does-it-take-make-an-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fat head of friendfeed statistics   BuzzGain</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-fat-head-of-friendfeed-statistics-buzzgain/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-fat-head-of-friendfeed-statistics-buzzgain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brett taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early adopter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve rubel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Our advisor Louis Gray attended the Lifestreaming panel by MIT/Stanford where FriendFeed founder Brett Taylor presented in the session titled “Lifestreaming : The Real time web“.
There’s a very interesting statistic that Brett mentions in his presentation.

FriendFeed has stored over 100 million entries shared by FriendFeed users.

BuzzGain tracks about 82,353 (as of August 2008) users for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Our advisor<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/09/bret-taylor-discusses-friendfeeds-road.html">Louis Gray</a><span> </span>attended the Lifestreaming panel by MIT/Stanford where FriendFeed founder<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://bret.appspot.com/entry/friendfeed-presentation-venture-lab">Brett Taylor</a><span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/6144012/Friend-Feed-Presentation">presented</a><span> </span>in the session titled “<a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080917/debating-the-real-time-web-at-stanford-university/">Lifestreaming : The Real time web</a>“.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">There’s a very interesting statistic that Brett mentions in his presentation.</p>
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #e0e0e0; margin: 20px; padding: 8px 8px 8px 15px;">
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #505050; font-size: 0.9em; line-height: 1.3em;">FriendFeed has stored over 100 million entries shared by FriendFeed users.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">BuzzGain tracks about 82,353 (as of August 2008) users for friendfeed which counts the<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2008/09/make-magic-with.html">who’s who of technology early adopters</a><span> </span>as its users. According to our numbers, the “early adopters” for technology Web 2.0 startups ranges from the bleeding edge user to the cutting edge user, but still totals about ~1.7 Million globally. Over 64% of these are in the US.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">These are your hyper enthusiasts, try anything first before anyone else does types of folks. You know; the kind that will stand in line for the Apple iPhone,<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/29/report-from-the-line/">2 days ahead of schedule</a>, the ones that are<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/21/the-notcot-network-a-study-in-structured-user-generated-content/">first to comment on every techcrunch post</a>, and the ones that<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/live_blogging_20.php">live blog every conference and seminar</a><span> </span>they attend.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.buzzgain.com/">BuzzGain</a><span> </span>tracks 1.7 Million “early adopters”, who frequently use (daily) about 4 Web2.0 applications and generate on average 1.7 posts daily (this is a big number BTW since the top users skew the numbers for the bottom of the list).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So how do we get 100,000,000 entries from 85K users? The active users of friendfeed (at least 1 comment weekly) per usage and one entry (either a blog post or a tweet, or a flickr photo upload) is about 61%. The rest either opened an account and never did anything with it, or just set it up and “forgot it”. For the sake of this argument I am going to assume every friendfeed account as an “active one”.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">That works to about 1175 entries per user. Assuming they were live from Dec 2007 (or about 10 months), that works out to about ~117 entries per user per month. This is about 4 entries daily. So if you are an early adopter, you are blogging once daily, tweeting 2-4 times daily and maybe uploading photos once a week.<br style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" /></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">The average # of tweets (which is the # 1 Web 2.0 application used by Friendfeed users) per early adopter per day is 9.2 (roughly 79% of friendfeed users have a twitter profile).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">My question on the number 100,000,000 from Brett is “So WHAT”?</strong>.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If every twitter user automatically posts their feed to friendfeed and that immediately constitutes an “entry” in friendfeed, why is that number even marginally useful?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Unless its just there to show a big number for the sake of showing momentum. Which I suspect is the case.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-fat-head-of-friendfeed-statistics-buzzgain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

