<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzzgain &#187; chris brogan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.buzzgain.com/tag/chris-brogan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.buzzgain.com</link>
	<description>BuzzGain empowers you to “Do It Yourself PR”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who should you target as for PR efforts?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigaom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake McKee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremiah Owyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReadWriteWeb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scoble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venture Beat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If you are a Web 2.0 or a social software startup trying to either launch a product or your company, getting relevant Buzz or Press is absolutely important. Long known to be the most cost effective means to generate awareness among potential users, PR gives you the sense of “arrival”. Notice I said cost effective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you are a Web 2.0 or a social software startup trying to either launch a product or your company, getting relevant Buzz or Press is absolutely important. Long known to be the most cost effective means to generate awareness among potential users, PR gives you the sense of “arrival”. Notice I said cost effective NOT least expensive.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you have been in the market over the last 2-3 months you already know that the best Web 2.0 PR folks, like<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://pop-pr.blogspot.com/">Jeremy Pepper</a><span> </span>or<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.briansolis.com/">Brian Solis</a><span> </span>(Disclaimer: Brian’s a cofounder at BuzzGain) are either already taken, or they are very expensive (most charge $10,000 minimum per month, or freelancers who charge $5000 / month). So if you have read about<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" title="Do It Yourself PR" href="../do-it-yourself-pr">Do It Yourself PR</a><span> </span>and think that might be the best way to save some cash, the question becomes who (all) do you target to get good coverage.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">The usual answer I hear is<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a>. They are no doubt the best, but you cant put all your eggs in the TechCrunch basket. Make a good target list just like you would for potential investors or customers.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out these folks should be on your list (In no particular order).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">ReadWriteWeb</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.mashable.com/">Mashable</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/">Chris Brogan</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">4.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://scobleizer.com/">Scobleizer</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">5.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.communityguy.com/">Jake McKee</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">6.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.web-strategist.com/">Jeremiah Owyang</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">7.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.webware.com/">Webware</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">8.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.louisgray.com/">Louis Gray</a><span> </span>(Disclaimer: Louis is associated with BuzzGain)</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">9.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.gigaom.com/">Giga Om</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">10.<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.venturebeat.com/">VentureBeat</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">The best case situation is to brief them all. But if you dont have time, (which is strange, but not out of the ordinary) then how would you select which ones to focus on? Also remember each of these folks likes exclusives, so it does not hurt to focus on a subset each time.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If you follow the simple rule of thumb that you shoud focus on the ones with the most traffic to their site, I contend you will not have achieved your purpose &#8211; which is to get the MOST number of people to effectively have a chance to learn about your offering.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So what metrics do we apply? As we talked about<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="../?p=27">blog authority</a><span> </span>and influence before, there are a whole host of other criteria, but here are the 3 that I would consider the most important.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Sentiment</strong>: Of the lot, ReadWriteWeb, Mashable and Chris are the most positive. Their article sentiment ratio is around 50-65% &#8211; very high and even with things that are not great, they accentuate the positive.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Outlinks</strong>: The number of links back to your site will give you a chance to convert awareness from PR into “potential leads” or prospects. The best link to post ratio (# of links per post) come from Louis, VentureBeat and GigaOm.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Engagement</strong>: Thanks to tagging, bookmarking, sharing Google feeds, tweeting, etc. you have the potential to reach a larger audience than visitors to your blog. So this extended audience should be counted into the overall metric for an individual’s reach. For extended reach Scobleizer, Chris and Louis are the best. Not only do they have a great number of followers on Twitter, friendfeed, delicious, etc., but their users are more engaged, clicking on links sent by these three than others.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So, if you had to make a call on exclusives, no doubt, focus on Rafe Needleman, Om Malik, Michael Arrington. Your best bang for the buck (for actual users) might come from some of these others.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/who-should-you-target-as-for-pr-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relevance in blog search results</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/relevance-in-blog-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/relevance-in-blog-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google blogsearch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icerocket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technorati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twingly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Doing vanity searches is probably one of the things most bloggers do. There’s a reason for that &#8211; the top 3 drivers of traffic to any blog are organic search, links from other websites (and blogs) and direct URL (i.e. No referrer).
What’s different about search relevance in the blogosphere (and the comments-sphere)?
a) If there’s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<div>
<p>Doing vanity searches is probably one of the things most bloggers do. There’s a reason for that &#8211; the top 3 drivers of traffic to any blog are organic search, links from other websites (and blogs) and direct URL (i.e. No referrer).</p>
<p>What’s different about search relevance in the blogosphere (and the comments-sphere)?</p>
<p>a) If there’s a blog that’s higher ranked than yours (by that I mean <strong>PageRank</strong>) and if you are mentioned in a post on that blog, it tends to appear higher in organic search results than your blog.</p>
<p>b) <strong>Recent </strong>(time sensitive) is more relevant in blog search. This is different than search results since the longer the page has been around, the more are the chances of getting more incoming links, which makes your blog post appear higher (though not always). Hence if you dont post frequently enough, your chances of appearing first on blog search engine results pages are minimal.</p>
<p>c) <strong>Comments</strong>: If you comment on a blog you input your blog URL and name details on that site. If that blog site is higher ranked for the search term then that blog appears higher than your own blog.</p>
<p>Lets do this by means of an example. I chose my friend <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/" target="_blank">Chris Brogan</a> since I expected (thanks to his PageRank, posting frequency and # of people that link to him) his posts and blog to be up there in terms of organic results.</p>
<p>I took 5 blog search engines <a href="http://ask.com/blogsearch?qsrc=169&amp;o=0&amp;l=dir&amp;q=chris+brogan&amp;t=a">Ask</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/search/chris+brogan?authority=a4&amp;language=en">Technorati</a>, <a href="http://www.twingly.com/search?q=chris+brogan&amp;approved=true">Twingly</a>, <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=chris+brogan&amp;btnG=Search+Blogs">Google BlogSearch</a> and <a href="http://www.icerocket.com/search?tab=blog&amp;lng=&amp;q=chris+brogan&amp;x=0&amp;y=0">IceRocket</a>. I entered the term Chris Brogan. Click on the links to see the results.</p>
<p>Results:</p>
<p>1. Except Google Blogsearch the rest dont even show Chris’s website on the first page!</p>
<p>2. The other blog search engines show other bloggers who link to Chris’ content rank higher than Chris’s blog.</p>
<p>3. If you do a blog search by relevance on certain search engines do you even get to Chris Brogan’s blog.</p>
<p>The bottom line and some interesting questions:</p>
<p>1. If you are searching for blogs (by name of individual) then Google Blogsearch (about 50% of the time) will get your the best result. Are the rest of the blog search engines are a waste of time?</p>
<p>2. To make the list of related blogs (see it above the fold) on Google BlogSearch you need to have a PageRank of X. Where we are not sure what X is yet, but we’ll find out.</p>
<p>3. Is searching blogs different than websites at all? After all most blogs now have a sitemap  similar to most large websites.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/relevance-in-blog-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Chris Brogan more influential than the potential Prime Minister of India?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/is-chris-brogan-more-influential-than-the-potential-prime-minister-of-india/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/is-chris-brogan-more-influential-than-the-potential-prime-minister-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L K Advani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Rank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We all love the topic of influence and authority. Its the primary reason any top 10 list exists. There are inherently many pitfalls in measuring and ranking any person’s authority online or offline. The questions that come up:
1. What parameters do you take into measuring authority? &#8211; for e.g. a few include: #twitter followers, # [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>We all love the topic of <a href="http://blog.altimetergroup.com/2009/03/future-of-social-networks-presentation-from-sxsw.html">influence</a> and <a href="../how-to-define-authority-on-the-web-21-metrics-from-buzzgain">authority</a>. Its the primary reason any top 10 list exists. There are inherently many pitfalls in measuring and ranking any person’s authority online or offline. The questions that come up:</p>
<p>1. What <a href="../how-to-define-authority-on-the-web-21-metrics-from-buzzgain">parameters do you take into measuring authority</a>? &#8211; for e.g. a few include: #twitter followers, # of re tweets, # blog readers, # of saved items on delicious? All of the above in some combination?</p>
<p>2. What about influential people that dont have a significant online presence? E.g. I know the Chief Mentor of Infosys Narayan Murthy has not a very big online presence, but every time he says something over 2 million people listen to him. How do we track that?</p>
<p>3. How much weight to you give to the various sources of influence &#8211; main stream news vs. blogs vs. twitter vs. any other social network.</p>
<p>We ran an interesting experiment with BuzzGain over the last few weeks. Friend and all around nice guy Chris Brogan was tracked against Indian prime minister candidate L. K. Advani. Here are the results.</p>
<p>1. In overall mentions, Chris is holding fort and in many cases getting talked about a lot more online than L K Advani. This is awesome for Chris, since over a billion people in India know L K Advani, and a lot fewer know Chris. But online, <a href="http://www.singhiskinng.com/main-final.htm.html">Chris is King</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_275" style="width: 310px;">L K Advani and Chris Brogan mentions</div>
<p>2. Sentiment for Chris and L K Advani is mostly similar, mostly positive and some negative, but its trending in similar directions.</p>
<div id="attachment_276" style="width: 310px;">L K Advani, Chris Brogan Sentiment Analysis</div>
<p>3. Main stream media news is where L K Advani beats Chris in mentions. Which is expected since the # of news outlets covering the elections in India is far greater than the # of bloggers writing about Chris and social media.</p>
<div id="attachment_277" style="width: 310px;">News Mentions for L K Advani and Chris Brogan</div>
<p>4. In the blogosphere, the exact opposite metrics hold true obviously, since the # of bloggers in the US far outweighs the # in India.</p>
<div id="attachment_278" style="width: 310px;">Blog mentions l K Advani and Chris Brogan</div>
<p>5. Finally there’s a reason he’s called the Mayor of Twitterville. Chris just overwhelms L K Advani in terms of mentions and retweets on Twitter.</p>
<div id="attachment_279" style="width: 310px;">Twitter mentions L K Advani and Chris Brogan</div>
<p>This leads us to a new set of questions:</p>
<p>1. How much more influential is Chris than Mr. Advani online?</p>
<p>2. Should we start to leverage circulation numbers for main stream media (offline viewership) to account for their reach when fewer than 10% of users are on the Internet (as in the case with India)?</p>
<p>3. What would you like us to compare next?</p>
<p>Drop me a note or leave a comment and we’ll explore that next in a future post.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/is-chris-brogan-more-influential-than-the-potential-prime-minister-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to define “authority” on the web &#8211; 21 metrics from BuzzGain</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-to-define-%e2%80%9cauthority%e2%80%9d-on-the-web-21-metrics-from-buzzgain/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-to-define-%e2%80%9cauthority%e2%80%9d-on-the-web-21-metrics-from-buzzgain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AideRSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzzgain ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Chris had a very interesting post on how does the web define authority.
In that he questions “It would be easy to bog ourselves down in definitions of the word “authority” itself. In this case, let’s agree that the working definition as it pertains to this topic is: a blog or website or even an individual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<div>
<p>Chris had a very interesting post on <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/how-does-the-web-define-authority/">how does the web define authority</a>.</p>
<p>In that he questions<em><strong> “It would be easy to bog ourselves down in definitions of the word “authority” itself. In this case, let’s agree that the working definition as it pertains to this topic is: a blog or website or even an individual person and their credibility, knowledge, and reputation on the Web. Is this close enough? How would you change this?”</strong></em></p>
<p>How do we define authority though? BuzzGain does it with 21 metrics.</p>
<p>1. <strong>Blog content and tags for a vertical</strong> &#8211; in this case social media. Its an exhaustive list of about 25 to tags ranging from facebook to personal branding and from social news to blogging &amp; blogs. The more you write about these topics the more likely you are an authority on some or all of them. You are more likely passionate about them, which is a start for being an authority.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Location of posts on SERP (Search engine results page) </strong>related to tags on Google Search. The higher you appear, (i.e. if you come on the first page of the SERP, you are higher than on the second page and so on) the more authority you have.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Frequency of posting</strong>. More frequent the better obviously.</p>
<p>4. <strong>Traffic</strong> &amp; <strong>Visitors</strong>: Both website visitors and # of RSS subscribers define traffic for a blog. We track them both to assign a metric number between 1 and 5. More traffic = higher the authority.</p>
<p>5. <strong>Engagement of readers</strong>: How many comments do you have per article. How many overall? What is the time to comment &#8211; i.e. How quickly does someone comment as soon as you post an article? More engaging readers define a more social experience and a higher authority.</p>
<p>7. <strong>Quality of posts:</strong> Thanks to our partnership with <a href="http://www.aiderss.com/">AideRSS</a>, we can tell which posts of yours are of high quality. This usually means which ones got “Dugg” or “Bookmarked” and how many comments exist on that post. Posts that have the highest quality are the ones we consider towards your authority.</p>
<p>7. <strong>Twitter</strong>: Of the 126 “socially aware” applications, this is the King Kong of social connections. We track # of followers, your “tweet frequency”, and the # of @ replies to your tweets. The assigned number for your Twitter authority comes as a combination of these characteristics.</p>
<p>8. <strong>Social Bookmarking</strong>: Currently we support Stumbleupon and delicious although we have been looking at diigo, Magnolia and Furl. More bookmarks and more followers indicate a sense of higher authority.</p>
<p>9. <strong>Social News</strong>: How many followers you have on Digg and the velocity of your digg posts to their overall appearance on the top of the digg homepage.</p>
<p>10. <strong>Social Network presence</strong>: This is obvious but the more “in the field” links to other folks you have on LinkedIn and Facebook the higher you rank in our authority list. We are looking to support other social networks, but these are the primary ones in our belief.</p>
<p>There are 11 other metrics that define authority, which I will mention briefly since this post is very long already. They include presence in blog directories, blog search engines (IceRocket, for e.g.), # of your incoming links, Google Pagerank, presence on photo sites and other microblogs, frequency of sharing items on Google reader, whether you podcast and videocast, # of times you guest blog on other “authority blog” and frequency of your interviews on other relevant / related blogs in your field.</p>
<p>image credit: <a href="http://www.allposters.com/">Allposters</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-to-define-%e2%80%9cauthority%e2%80%9d-on-the-web-21-metrics-from-buzzgain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BuzzGain Recommends: Discussions on the economic crisis</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/buzzgain-recommends-discussions-on-the-economic-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/buzzgain-recommends-discussions-on-the-economic-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Defren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Lots of discussion on the economic crisis and social media. Here are the ones that generated the most reactions and engagement:
1. Todd asks if Social media will help PR weather the storm?
2. Chris talks about 25 ways social media prepares you for the downturn.
3. We covered where you should be spending marketing dollars during a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Lots of discussion on the economic crisis and social media. Here are the ones that generated the most reactions and engagement:</p>
<p>1. Todd asks if <a href="http://www.pr-squared.com/MT_Virtual/mt-comments.cgi">Social media will help PR weather the storm</a>?</p>
<p>2. Chris talks about <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/25-ways-social-media-prepares-you-for-the-downturn/">25 ways social media prepares you for the downturn</a>.</p>
<p>3. We covered <a href="http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=94">where you should be spending marketing dollars during a downturn</a>?</p>
<p>4. A good <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/answers/marketing-sales/public-relations/MAR_PRR/333850-26769689?browseIdx=0&amp;sik=1223309874221&amp;goback=.amq">LinkedIn discussion</a> on how to help PR avoid the dramatic cuts.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/buzzgain-recommends-discussions-on-the-economic-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 top categories of ideas / topics to blog about</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/5-top-categories-of-ideas-topics-to-blog-about/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/5-top-categories-of-ideas-topics-to-blog-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogger Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lois Kelly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a corporate blog and are getting stuck trying to figure out what to write, we have have some suggestions from the experts, and also a set of them on our own:
First the experts:
1. Chris Brogan: 100 Blog topics to write about and 50 blog topic ideas.
2. Lois Kelly. 17 blog worthy topics
3. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a corporate blog and are getting stuck trying to figure out what to write, we have have some suggestions from the experts, and also a set of them on our own:</p>
<p>First the experts:</p>
<p>1. Chris Brogan: <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/100-blog-topics-i-hope-you-write/">100 Blog topics</a> to write about and <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/50-blog-topics-marketers-could-write-for-their-companies/">50 blog topic ideas.</a></p>
<p>2. Lois Kelly. <a href="http://blog.foghound.com/389/">17 blog worthy topics</a></p>
<p>3. <a href="http://www.ihelpyoublog.com/20070316-101-great-posting-ideas-that-will-make-your-blog-sizzle">101 great posting ideas</a>.</p>
<p>4. Performancing: <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/blogging/10-ideas-for-your-next-blog-post-138270.php">10 ideas for your next blog post.</a></p>
<p>5. RSS blog specifications <a href="http://www.rss-specifications.com/blog-post-ideas.htm">10 places to get blog post ides.</a></p>
<p>6. Pay Doyle. <a href="http://www.patdoyle.com/23-ideas-for-blog-posts/25/">23 ideas for blog posts.</a></p>
<p>So what are the top 5 categories of posts that are useful for corporate blogs:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Exclusive Interviews with news makers</strong>. Either within your company or other industry experts. Almost everyone loves</p>
<p>2. <strong>Industry trends and information</strong>: This includes new ideas, challenging problems still facing the industry as a whole and other related topics to your industry.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Tools and technology reviews</strong>: Always one for the tech savvy folks in your audience.</p>
<p>4. <strong>Content and Event reviews</strong> &#8211; A review of books, new whitepaper, etc. Or a review of conferences, seminars and industry events is always a good draw for folks that did not attend the show.</p>
<p>5. <strong>Tips, tricks and how to</strong>: If you figured something out remember its worth writing about since there are at least 40% of the folks in the industry (more likely 60-80%) who will benefit from your learning.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>image: <a href="http://realestatetomato.typepad.com/the_real_estate_tomato/blog_food_small.jpg">Real Estate Tomato</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/5-top-categories-of-ideas-topics-to-blog-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

