<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzzgain &#187; Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.buzzgain.com/category/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.buzzgain.com</link>
	<description>BuzzGain empowers you to “Do It Yourself PR”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The 5 myths of software entrepreneurship</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-5-myths-of-software-entrepreneurship/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-5-myths-of-software-entrepreneurship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onstartups entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software startup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Myths of the software startup
From the Economist. “For most people the term “entrepreneur” simply means anybody who starts a business, be it a corner shop or a high-tech start up.”
The Economist provides these 5 myths for entrepreneurship in general:
1. The first is that entrepreneurs are “orphans and outcasts”, to borrow the phrase of George Gilder, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<div>
<div id="attachment_285" style="width: 231px;">Myths of the software startup</div>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13216025">Economist</a>. “For most people the term “entrepreneur” simply means anybody who starts a business, be it a corner shop or a high-tech start up.”</p>
<p>The Economist provides these 5 myths for entrepreneurship in general:</p>
<p>1. The first is that entrepreneurs are “orphans and outcasts”, to borrow the phrase of George Gilder, an American intellectual: lonely Atlases battling a hostile world or anti-social geeks inventing world-changing gizmos in their garrets.</p>
<p>2. The second myth is that most entrepreneurs are just out of short trousers.</p>
<p>3. The third myth is that entrepreneurship is driven mainly by venture capital.</p>
<p>4. The fourth myth is that to succeed, entrepreneurs must produce some world-changing new product.</p>
<p>5. The fifth myth is that entrepreneurship cannot flourish in big companies.</p>
<p>I wanted to be specific to <strong>software entrepreneurship, </strong>which I have observed over 3 successful startups so far and 2 unsuccessful ones:</p>
<p>Myth #1: <strong>The most important “first person” in your software start up is your technical “guru”, a developer, or the sales person. </strong>The first person you actually need is a product manager. Someone that owns the product and is able to manage conflicting priorities and still keep customers happy. This person can be technical or a sales person, but most importantly needs to be able to “look at the forest from the trees”. Most developers and sales folks cannot do that. Not all, most.</p>
<p>Myth #2: <strong>After your version 1 things get easier. </strong><a href="http://onstartups.com/home/tabid/3339/bid/8853/Startup-Conversations-With-Myself-What-Should-I-Work-On.aspx">Version 1 in fact is the easiest</a>. Also the most buggy, feature “light” and holds lots of “promise”. Customers can do just about enough to get frustrated. Your only hope is they dont give up on it.</p>
<p>Myth #3: <strong>Lack of funding kills 90% of software startups</strong>. It is <a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/20090301/how-hard-could-it-be-start-up-static.html?partner=fogcreek">lack of a compelling enough problem</a> to solve. Not funding. Most startups I have encountered are not solving a problem that’s critical enough or big enough in terms of market to make them successful.</p>
<p>Myth #4: Your product should be so intuitive, and useful to your customer that they spread the word and generate business <strong>so you dont need marketing or sales people</strong>. While I <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001177.html">wont agree its 100% about marketing</a>, but if marketing were making sure you identified the problem your customer had, then provided a solution to it, described it in simple terms and solved that problem, then its 100% marketing.</p>
<p>Myth #5: <strong>To prove that you are unique and different you have to “patent” your algorithm or process</strong>. While patents are useful, they are <a href="http://deepfreeze9.blogspot.com/2009/03/lessons-from-software-for-patents-vs.html">not going to be the reason you’ll get rich</a> with your software startup. Second the return on time invested to get your patent to its value both short and medium term is questionable.</p>
<p>If you are in a software startup what other myths exist that you are aware of?</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-5-myths-of-software-entrepreneurship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why dont technology startups leverage PR even if its more effective?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/why-dont-technology-startups-leverage-pr-even-if-its-more-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/why-dont-technology-startups-leverage-pr-even-if-its-more-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogger Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shift Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Defren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Our good friend Todd posted a very good piece on how PR helps raise venture capital. In it, he quotes a survey from BIGfrontier Communications that has the following statistics:


Startup companies that engage in PR campaigns are 30% more successful in getting funding within one to three months than those that don’t.
Forty-four percent of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Our good friend Todd posted a very good piece on how<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="../*%20Startup%20companies%20that%20engage%20in%20PR%20campaigns%20are%2030%%20more%20successful%20in%20getting%20funding%20within%20one%20to%20three%20months%20than%20those%20that%20don%27t.%20%20%20%20%20*%20Forty-four%20percent%20of%20the%20respondents%20who%20used%20PR%20outreach%20received%20funding%20in%20the%20one-to-three-month%20time%20period%20versus%2014%%20of%20those%20that%20did%20not.%20%20%20%20%20*%20Seventy-eight%20percent%20of%20respondents%20who%20said%20PR%20helped%20in%20their%20funding%20efforts%20are%20planning%20to%20use%20some%20of%20their%20VC%20dollars%20for%20additional%20PR.%20%20%20%20%20*%20Ironically,%20the%20survey%20also%20found%20that%20only%2018%%20of%20the%20300%20startups%20surveyed%20had%20a%20PR%20program%20in%20place%20during%20the%20funding%20process.">PR helps raise venture capital</a>. In it, he quotes a<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.pria.com.au/news/id/560">survey</a><span> </span>from<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.prweekus.com/Study-finds-PR-aids-startups-funding-efforts/article/121318/">BIGfrontier Communications</a><span> </span>that has the following statistics:</p>
<ul style="margin: 0px 0px 16px 20px; padding: 0px;">
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #e0e0e0; margin: 20px; padding: 8px 8px 8px 15px;">
<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">Startup companies that engage in PR campaigns are 30% more successful in getting funding within one to three months than those that don’t.</li>
<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">Forty-four percent of the respondents who used PR outreach received funding in the one-to-three-month time period versus 14% of those that did not.</li>
<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">Seventy-eight percent of respondents who said PR helped in their funding efforts are planning to use some of their VC dollars for additional PR.</li>
<li style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 5px;">Ironically, the survey also found that only 18% of the 300 startups surveyed had a PR program in place during the funding process.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So it begs the question why dont startups employ PR as a marketing strategy early as they can? Or why dont they hire a PR agency quicker?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Running a startup myself and having a background in Marketing, I can tell you my main reasons are the following:</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">PR is not easy</strong>. Putting an ad campaign on Google for paid adwords is dead simple. Buying a target email list is relatively easy. Putting together an email campaign (or a poorly conceived spam campaign) is easier. Attending a trade show and putting together a booth to attract customers is easier than having to build relationships with reporters and bloggers. PR depends on people. Other marketing forms are dependent on money and processes. Entrepreneurs who have a background in technology prefer working with things that are predictable (since everything else about the startup is unpredictable).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">PR takes time.<span> </span></strong>That’s the one thing entrepreneurs and smaller companies dont have enough of. Yes, everything takes time and there’s a return on time (ROT, not ROI) and PR does provide a great return on time.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Only if you have done it before<span> </span></strong>can you navigate the landscape. Most first time entrepreneurs have not.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">3. Hiring a PR agency is “expensive”.<span> </span></strong>The average quote from any good PR agency you’d get for even a 2-5 person startup is $10,000 a month in Silicon Valley. I can do a Google ad words campaign with less than $100 budget per month. Here’s the funny part: If that becomes $300 budget daily, that’s as much as PR. But its in bite-sized chunks.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">4.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">PR requires specialists</strong>. The first marketing hire is paid to “put together a website, manage a trade show booth”. There are not enough qualified PR individual consultants to help smaller companies with smaller budgets.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">5.<span> </span><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">PR is not tied to the lead generation process or the board level agenda.<span> </span></strong>PR generates awareness and that’s not easily accountable. In my board meeting every month, I get asked about my lead generation funnel. Never have I been asked to show the recent press clips about the company.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Finally, making your mark through the noisy world right now is tough. There are innumerable startups in any given field and there’s way too much noise with multiple companies providing the same message and solutions. Given that reality, how is spending on PR justified if you are going to be yet another startup in the crowd?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Having identfied the reasons why entrepreneurs dont invest in PR, we’ll follow this up with possible solutions for how the PR world can adapt to the challenge in a future post.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/why-dont-technology-startups-leverage-pr-even-if-its-more-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of the Union: social media monitoring market &#8211; Vendors &amp; strategies</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/state-of-the-union-social-media-monitoring-market-vendors-strategies/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/state-of-the-union-social-media-monitoring-market-vendors-strategies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buzzlogic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collective Intellect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radian 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visible Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

As a participant in the Social media monitoring or Social Media analysis market I took some time to check out the competitors and get a lay of the land. There are many social media monitoring companies. In fact we track about 42 companies ranging from those that have raised over $40+ Million to a single [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<div>
<p>As a participant in the Social media monitoring or Social Media analysis market I took some time to check out the competitors and get a lay of the land. There are many social media monitoring companies. In fact we track about 42 companies ranging from those that have raised over $40+ Million to a single developer providing some free solutions.</p>
<p>Here are some high level observations:</p>
<p>1. Over the last year data collection and reporting have become table stakes or “commodity”. Everyone does a simple listen dashboard or a total number of mentions and basic sentiment analysis. Since the data is all available freely (or at very little cost) over the net, its value is appropriately priced &#8211; free.</p>
<p>2. There are 3 basic areas of differentiation for vendors &#8211; Text analysis, Signal to Noise intelligence and CRM integration. All thes products have a basic “tag cloud” and keywords. Everyone also has some form of authority or ranking which is proprietary and in most cases rudimentary. Finally the CRM integration is only being done by a few vendors. These are areas that lend themselves to differentiation. From our customers we have heard that Radian 6 is doing a great job at the CRM integration and Collective Intellect has done a good job in the text analysis.</p>
<p>3. Finally dashboards and representation. As you can imagine every vendor has their view of the perfect dashboard needed by the client. This is another area where it can easily become commodity so putting effort here while “table stakes” is not going to result in a huge differentiation. Of the lot we have heard both BuzzLogic and Visible Technologies are doing a good job here.</p>
<p>Lastly business metrics that matter such as # customers, revenues, profitability etc. are still important. The grand total of # of customers of all vendors (paying customers that is) is still about 100-200 per vendor. We are at little over 1000+ customers paying so we are among the largest in terms of # of customers, but working our way towards profitability and certainly not the largest in terms of revenue.</p>
<p>See related post by <a href="http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2009/06/the_state_of_social_media_measurement_aka_brand_monitoring_and_listening_platforms.php">Max Kalehoff</a> and an older <a href="http://www.forrester.com/rb/Research/wave%26trade%3B_listening_platforms%2C_q1_2009/q/id/48093/t/2">Forrester report</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/state-of-the-union-social-media-monitoring-market-vendors-strategies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is BFO? Brilliant Flash of the Obvious</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/what-is-bfo-brilliant-flash-of-the-obvious/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/what-is-bfo-brilliant-flash-of-the-obvious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
1. Social Media is here to stay
2. Brands have to engage with consumers
3. There is no “lets go back to brand advertising” anymore

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1. Social Media is here to stay</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2. Brands have to engage with consumers</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3. There is no “lets go back to brand advertising” anymore</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/what-is-bfo-brilliant-flash-of-the-obvious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keeping your New Year’s resolution with social media in 3 steps</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/keeping-your-new-year%e2%80%99s-resolution-with-social-media-in-3-steps/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/keeping-your-new-year%e2%80%99s-resolution-with-social-media-in-3-steps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year Resolutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Social Media New Year Resolution
If you are like 43% of Americans who decided that “losing weight” was one of your New Year’s resolutions, then you’re probably also like 31% of them who have already given up on it. Yes its only the 12th January, but most people’s resolve drops after 1-2 weeks.
Several magazines and Web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<div>
<div style="width: 458px;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-119" title="new-years-resolution" src="http://news.buzzgain.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/new-years-resolution.jpg" alt="new-years-resolution" width="448" height="300" />Social Media New Year Resolution</div>
<p>If you are like <a href="http://www.proactivechange.com/motivation/resolutions/research.htm">43% of Americans</a> who decided that “losing weight” was one of your <a href="http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/AllWoman/html/20090111T190000-0500_144718_OBS_HOW_TO__STILL__KEEP_YOUR_NEW_YEAR_S_RESOLUTIONS_.asp">New Year’s resolutions</a>, then you’re probably also like <a href="http://www.welchmedia.com/news/article_385.shtml">31% of them who have already given</a> up on it. Yes its only the 12th January, but <a href="http://media.www.thelantern.com/media/storage/paper333/news/2009/01/12/Opinion/Dont-Feel.Bad.Most.New.Years.Resolutions.Are.Already.Broken-3583302.shtml">most people’s resolve drops</a> after 1-2 weeks.</p>
<blockquote><p>Several magazines and Web sites ran polls, but most rated the top three resolutions as “resolving debt,” “losing weight” or “managing money better.” Cosmopolitan did a guide on <strong>resolutions a person should never make</strong>. These ranged from “changing your man” to “tripling the number of friends one has on Facebook.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The simple equation to reducing weight is eat less and work out more. Lets assume you are in a startup and really dont have time to work out “more”. You can afford the 15-20 min of cardio but that’s it.</p>
<p>The only remaining option is to reduce your eating (eat more healthy, reduce portion sizes, etc).</p>
<p>The amazing part that I personally found out is that if you so busy and overworked, you’ll probably not feel all that hungry anyway.  In simple terms the more occupied you are with something the less likely you are to put on weight.</p>
<p>That’s step #1. <strong>Do more work towards the goal which dramatically cuts down on “free” hence unproductive time.</strong></p>
<p>So what does this have to do with social media?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://ibdcrohns.about.com/cs/mentalhealth/a/newyearresolve.htm">chances of doing something are 55% higher </a><strong>if you have someone egging you along </strong>or helping you do it. For some reason if you have someone to celebrate the “end goal”, you are more motivated to do it. That’s where social media helps. Using your twitter or facebook friends to help you along the goal dramatically improves the chances of keeping that resolution.</p>
<p>That’s step #2: <strong>Let your friends help you towards that goal.</strong></p>
<p>The #1 reason people dont keep resolutions is because they <a href="http://www.dumblittleman.com/2008/01/fail-to-achieve-new-year-resolutions.html">set themselves up for failure </a>by attempting something in 1 step. The gradual “small steps” towards a goal is a much better and preferred way to get to your goal is what’s been scientifically proven. There are many “cold turkey” examples, but they are exceptions not the rule.</p>
<p>Step #3: <strong>Use reminders, setup smaller objectives and goal posts</strong> <strong>to your resolution</strong>.</p>
<p>What are your resolutions? Are you keeping them? Remember Santa’s going to be back in a blink and before you know it its December.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/keeping-your-new-year%e2%80%99s-resolution-with-social-media-in-3-steps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting reads for Jan 6th: Marketing Challenges in 2009</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-6th-marketing-challenges-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-6th-marketing-challenges-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Marketing Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
1. Cece Salomon-Lee talks about feedback from her Linkedin network on the top challenges for Marketing in 2009 &#8211; 
Tighter budgets, Keeping close to the customer and Getting more from less. 
Funny enough I dont see these three going away from the top 5 anytime regardless of the year. So marketers are not looking to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>1. <span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://prmeetsmarketing.wordpress.com/2009/01/06/what-are-your-top-three-marketing-challenges-for-2009/">Cece Salomon-Lee</a> talks about feedback from her Linkedin network on the top challenges for Marketing in 2009 &#8211; </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Tighter budgets, Keeping close to the customer and Getting more from less. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Funny enough I dont see these three going away from the top 5 anytime regardless of the year. So marketers are not looking to have a year different from any other even though we’ll be in the toughest environment for selling in our lifetime. </span></p></blockquote>
<p>Is there a disconnect between marketing teams and the general environment?</p>
<p>2. Josh Hallett: The best method for social media engagement in organizations &#8211; <a href="http://hyku.com/blog/archives/001971.html">Centralized or Decentralized</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>For large organizations the sheer conversational volume can be overwhelming for one person, or even a department. As we all know, not every conversation is important. How do you determine which issue require responses?</p></blockquote>
<p>3. Shannon Cherry On <a href="http://www.commonsensepr.com/2009/01/05/common-sense-pr-facebook-style/">facebook spam and the art of building a relationship</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The key to any PR program is to build relationships &#8211; and that includes on Facebook. In my case, I may no longer call you a ‘friend’ if you continue to spam me with irrelevant stuff.</p></blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/interesting-reads-for-jan-6th-marketing-challenges-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 changes newspapers will adopt in 2009, and how to use it for your benefit</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/top-5-changes-newspapers-will-adopt-in-2009-and-how-to-use-it-for-your-benefit/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/top-5-changes-newspapers-will-adopt-in-2009-and-how-to-use-it-for-your-benefit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mainstream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Its no secret that newspapers and print publications are having a rough time adapting to social media and citizen journalism. Its fairly simple to see the equation to get better (but a whole lot difficult to implement) from a business standpoint. Thanks to market forces the revenues are lower and expenses are higher.
How does a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Its no secret that newspapers and<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.paidcontent.co.uk/entry/419-why-the-nail-is-in-newspapers-coffin-for-2009/">print publications are having a rough time<span> </span></a>adapting to social media and citizen journalism. Its fairly simple to see the equation to get better (but a whole lot difficult to implement) from a business standpoint. Thanks to market forces the revenues are lower and expenses are higher.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">How does a newspaper get revenues higher? &#8211; diversify sources of it -<a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=42000">besides advertising<span> </span></a>(print or online) and classifieds.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">How do you cut costs? &#8211; remove print and reduce staff (journalists).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So what changes can we expect in 2009? Newspapers will:</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1a. Partner with bloggers (experts) to create highly specific content for niche reader and layoff reporters / journalists. The bloggers themselves will be initially “paid” for with increased “readership” and a “platform to create their personal brand”. I expect it will be 2011 or 2012 before these bloggers they recruit will actually be paid for in cash.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1b. Create regional networks of citizen-reporters ( a-la About.com circa 1999) to source local content from local providers. This is a no brainer. The outsourcing of local content is already taking place to highly sub-regional or mini-metro self-employed or unemployed<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www3.flickr.com/photos/vinu/sets/72157610144709049/">citizen reporters</a>.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2. Abandon the print edition for subscribers and make print only for off-the-rack purchases (albeit more expensive).<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/1029/p25s01-usgn.html">Print is on its way out</a>. I expect more publications to abandon print (citing green credentials, high costs, etc). The ones that will print will take their “best of online content OR create a custom bind for racks &#8211; which will be distributed primarily to airlines, hotels, etc. for off rack purchases.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3. Remove wire service (AP, Business Wire). This also<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-tribune-considers-dropping-ap-wire-service-within-two-years-report/">already happening</a><span> </span>in the “cut costs” bucket.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">4. Use their “objective” nature to rate local providers and adopt the “Angie’s list” type model for recommending local services. This falls in the increase revenue bucket. Another example of such a service is Yelp (restaurant recommendations). I expect newspapers to start partnering with crowd sourcing content providers to generate hyperlocal “community of interest or location” type services.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Really understanding what services are required by “local” users that they are willing to pay for and provide those. “Pay per action” model will be a big beneficiary.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">5. Be a provider of demographic data and detailed local information to marketers. Newspapers will be more willing to sell their treasure-trove of information about local readers and help marketers in their campaigns.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">What do you think? Am I a missing something?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Image credit:<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="./Top%205%20changes%20newspapers%20will%20adopt%20in%202009,%20and%20how%20to%20use%20it%20for%20your%20benefit%20%20%20BuzzGain_files/phoenix_rising.jpg">J Fortune on Photobucket</a></p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/top-5-changes-newspapers-will-adopt-in-2009-and-how-to-use-it-for-your-benefit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much to pay consultants for Social Media expertise?</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-much-to-pay-consultants-for-social-media-expertise/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-much-to-pay-consultants-for-social-media-expertise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B L Ochman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Heuer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODweyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The 2nd most vexing topic after “How do I measure social media ROI” is “How much do I pay for social media?“.
Friend and social media consultant, Chris has started a new company. His website display’s their pricing. B L Ochman has had a similar practice for years, displaying her pricing upfront. Its a pretty open [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2></h2>
<div>
<p>The 2nd most vexing topic after “How do I measure social media ROI” is “<strong>How much do I pay for social media?</strong>“.</p>
<p>Friend and social media consultant, Chris has started a <a href="http://adhocnium.com/our-services/">new company</a>. His website display’s their pricing. <a href="http://www.whatsnextblog.com/archives/2008/12/adhocnium_asks_why_dont_consultants_publish_their_rates.asp">B L Ochman</a> has had a similar practice for years, displaying her pricing upfront. Its a pretty open and upfront policy which I think is very different from the many consultants who will answer the question with a standard “It depends”. Regardless of whether you think the <a href="http://www.odwyerpr.com/blog/index.php?/archives/410-Social-Media-Consulting-Rates-at-Top-of-PR-Pay-Scale.html">pricing is too high</a>, or its <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/prnewser/social_networks/more_money_in_social_media_102906.asp">just right</a>, its a starting point.</p>
<p>I know many consultants are loathe to price by the hour, since it means you have to work “that many hours” regardless of if you are efficient or not. Also pricing by the hour opens you up to competitive pricing &#8211; because clients want to compare prices between service providers. This is the vexing problem for most. If a consultant is highly efficient, they get more work done in quicker time, they expect to charge more. But since differentiation is so difficult for most consultants in social media, they have to bid “competitively” &#8211; thereby reducing their “rates”.</p>
<p>I have contracted with 3 different agencies for Social Media services before and paid very different rates for their services.</p>
<p>Here’s the <strong>myth </strong>of social media consultant pricing:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">You get what you pay for.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><strong><em>Not at all. </em></strong></p>
<p>The reality is</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>You get what you set the objectives for.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>If you are clear about what you need to get done, great! You’ll get exactly what you asked for. The objective could be to come up with a strategy, execute some campaign or just get your folks trained and ready. Any of these comes at a price. So how about some examples:</p>
<p>Granted these projects were all different, but to give you a quick sense of pricing:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Introduction of blogging hands on class</strong>: We did this in 2006 to 15 people at our company. Most knew about blogs, but were not sure how to go about getting started with blogging. The trainer was a social media practitioner and was a pretty good blogger in his own right. We paid  <strong>$4800 for two days of training</strong>. This included a “get to know the team dinner (the previous night of the training). We also reimbursed expenses (airfare, 3 days of hotel and dinner). The objective was to get people comfortable with blogging and get them to actually start to post.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Blogger relations</strong>: This was included as a part of our PR agency’s monthly retainer. Our monthly retainer was $9600 and they added another<strong> $3500 per month </strong>for this project. The objective was to engage with the top 15 influencers in our space. This project included identification of the blogger, engaging with them and building a relationship between them and our product teams . We identified this to be a 3 month effort at the minimum.</p>
<p>3. <strong>SEO optimizing our blog content</strong>. One of our objectives for the blog was to provide content that would appear higher up in the organic search rankings. Now there are folks that wont call this social media, but our objectives were to drive traffic to our site by all means and our own blog was one of them. Our SEO consultant charged us $50 per post to a maximum of 20 posts per month<strong> or about $1000 per month</strong>. This was just for SEO and cleanup NOT writing the posts in the first place.</p>
<p>I’ll explore which of these gave us the biggest bang for the buck in a later post, but this should give you some ball park estimates.</p>
<p>What have you paid for social media consultants? Did you get what you paid for? What would you do better / differently?</p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/daviddmuir/">David DMuir</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/how-much-to-pay-consultants-for-social-media-expertise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The trouble with offering an integrated TV and Internet marketing campaign   BuzzGain</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-trouble-with-offering-an-integrated-tv-and-internet-marketing-campaign-buzzgain/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-trouble-with-offering-an-integrated-tv-and-internet-marketing-campaign-buzzgain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Stream Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Century 21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Integrated Media Measurement Inc. did a survey, to understand the viewing habits of people who also surf the Internet at the same time. First some key takeaways:
1. TV watchers spent an average of 9.3% of their time online and simultaneously watching the tube.
2. Among viewers watching broadcast TV, 11% also are surfing the Web. For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Integrated Media Measurement Inc. did a<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/04/integrated_campaigns_worth_ove.php">survey</a>, to understand the viewing habits of people who also surf the Internet at the same time. First some key takeaways:</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">1. TV watchers spent an average of 9.3% of their time online and simultaneously watching the tube.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">2. Among viewers watching broadcast TV, 11% also are surfing the Web. For cable viewers, it’s 8.2%.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">3. The survey also found that women, who do the bulk of the shopping, do the most simultaneous viewing.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Most marketers and advertising agencies who are trying to advice clients on an integrated Television and Internet camapaign fail to convince their clients about the ROI in that model.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><em style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Agencies found that in addition to the lack of metrics, the biggest impediment to effectively adopting digital media was that key people at a company, including senior management, simply don’t have a deep understanding of digital media.</strong></em></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Compare this to<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://adage.com/cmostrategy/article?article_id=136325">Century 21 Real Estate<span> </span></a>which has been using social media strategies to make lead generation more efficient.</p>
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #e0e0e0; margin: 20px; padding: 8px 8px 8px 15px;">
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #505050; font-size: 0.9em; line-height: 1.3em;">Its not that the marketers at Century 21 are more “in the know” than others.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #505050; font-size: 0.9em; line-height: 1.3em;">“This is very much Century 21 beginning the conversation, and a great forum for a radio talk show, with great queries and a very open conversation for that to be a two-way dialogue,” Ms. Thorne said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Its about the specific marketing goal they want to achieve and how they measure it.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Finding effectiveness of “engagement” and “share of voice” is difficult.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Reducing cost of lead generation is not.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-trouble-with-offering-an-integrated-tv-and-internet-marketing-campaign-buzzgain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Social Media Marketing scale is the wrong question to ask</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/can-social-media-marketing-scale-is-the-wrong-question-to-ask/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/can-social-media-marketing-scale-is-the-wrong-question-to-ask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I was intrigued by the question Peter Kim asked on his blog a few weeks ago, paraphrasing &#8211; “Does social media marketing matter? If it does, can it scale?”. (Side note: that tells you how much I have to think to come up with a halfway good response, since it requires a lot of thinking).
Even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>I was intrigued by the question <a href="http://www.beingpeterkim.com/2008/08/social-media-ma.html">Peter Kim</a> asked on his blog a few weeks ago, paraphrasing &#8211; “Does social media marketing matter? If it does, can it scale?”. (Side note: that tells you how much I have to think to come up with a halfway good response, since it requires a lot of thinking).</p>
<p>Even with accidental examples of viral success and <a href="http://www.beingpeterkim.com/2008/10/234-social-medi.html">social media examples</a> abound, I could not come up with them because “conversation marketing” involves engaging with people as opposed to talking at them, and a big part of social media is having conversations.</p>
<p>If you are a marketing professional there are multiple modes of getting to customers &#8211; (which is the point of marketing anyway) including advertising, sponsorships, newsletters, <a href="http://www.buzzgain.com/">public relations</a>, <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/05/29/web-strategy-how-to-evolve-your-irrelevant-corporate-website/">your corporate website</a>, events (seminars, conferences, webinars), search optimization, direct mail etc. For a more comprehensive list check out <a href="http://www.webex.com/web-seminars/view_recording/961231208">Brian’s multimodal lead generation webinar</a>.</p>
<p>The persistent lack of resources in marketing (or high leverage ratio) requires that most marketing folks spend time on highly scalable opportunities &#8211; Why? <strong>The pipeline conversion ratio </strong>(or how many suspects turn into prospects, and how many prospects turn into customers) is something they take for granted as an “industry best practice”.</p>
<p>The amazing part is that several of the above mentioned marketing vehicles are “high touch” or not very scalable. So does that mean you should give up regional conferences, breakfast sessions or executive briefings? I took Brian’s top list of lead generation and put them on a 2X2 matrix showing scalability and effectiveness. All comments and criticism welcome on which quadrant each of the vehicles reside. The point of that graphic is that not everything marketers do is scalable and effective.</p>
<p>So why do we do them?</p>
<p>Easy: <strong>Its what a segment of your customers want. </strong>Period.</p>
<p><strong>As a good marketer you have to be where your customers are, do what your customers want and do it while managing to your budget.</strong></p>
<p>There are 2 more main reasons:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Be cost effective</strong>: <a href="http://www.emergencemarketing.com/2008/11/03/what-to-do-in-a-downturn-when-marketing-budgets-get-slashed/">Francois interviewed</a> Paula Drum, the <a href="http://www.pauladrum.com/">VP of marketing for H&amp;R Block</a> and here’s the comment that struck a chord:</p>
<blockquote><p>Based on her experience that traditional marketing program are more capital intensive, and social media marketing programs are more labor intensive &#8211; she recommends that you move some of the people resources which are going to free up because of the budget reductions to social media marketing programs.</p></blockquote>
<p>Social media is labor intensive not capital intensive so in some ways its more <strong>capital effective</strong>. During a downturn you want more capital effective means of marketing.</p>
<p>2. Use the right marketing vehicle for the <strong>right stage of your customer acquisition pipeline</strong>. For someone with a hammer, they say, everything looks like a nail. If you position social media as the <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e62444aa8c/brave-new-obamaian-world-from-ucbcomedy">solution to all evils</a>, then it wont scale, wont be cost effective and will not add value. BTW check out the video link in this paragraph, its HILARIOUS and very topical.</p>
<p>So what’s the right question to ask?</p>
<p><strong>What are the MOST effective (cost, conversion and stage of customer acquisition) uses for social media?</strong></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/can-social-media-marketing-scale-is-the-wrong-question-to-ask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
