<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buzzgain &#187; friendfeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.buzzgain.com/category/friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.buzzgain.com</link>
	<description>BuzzGain empowers you to “Do It Yourself PR”</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The fat head of friendfeed statistics   BuzzGain</title>
		<link>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-fat-head-of-friendfeed-statistics-buzzgain/</link>
		<comments>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-fat-head-of-friendfeed-statistics-buzzgain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mukund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzGain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brett taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early adopter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve rubel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.buzzgain.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Our advisor Louis Gray attended the Lifestreaming panel by MIT/Stanford where FriendFeed founder Brett Taylor presented in the session titled “Lifestreaming : The Real time web“.
There’s a very interesting statistic that Brett mentions in his presentation.

FriendFeed has stored over 100 million entries shared by FriendFeed users.

BuzzGain tracks about 82,353 (as of August 2008) users for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px;"></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Our advisor<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/09/bret-taylor-discusses-friendfeeds-road.html">Louis Gray</a><span> </span>attended the Lifestreaming panel by MIT/Stanford where FriendFeed founder<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://bret.appspot.com/entry/friendfeed-presentation-venture-lab">Brett Taylor</a><span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/6144012/Friend-Feed-Presentation">presented</a><span> </span>in the session titled “<a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080917/debating-the-real-time-web-at-stanford-university/">Lifestreaming : The Real time web</a>“.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">There’s a very interesting statistic that Brett mentions in his presentation.</p>
<blockquote style="border-left: 4px solid #e0e0e0; margin: 20px; padding: 8px 8px 8px 15px;">
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #505050; font-size: 0.9em; line-height: 1.3em;">FriendFeed has stored over 100 million entries shared by FriendFeed users.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">BuzzGain tracks about 82,353 (as of August 2008) users for friendfeed which counts the<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2008/09/make-magic-with.html">who’s who of technology early adopters</a><span> </span>as its users. According to our numbers, the “early adopters” for technology Web 2.0 startups ranges from the bleeding edge user to the cutting edge user, but still totals about ~1.7 Million globally. Over 64% of these are in the US.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">These are your hyper enthusiasts, try anything first before anyone else does types of folks. You know; the kind that will stand in line for the Apple iPhone,<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/29/report-from-the-line/">2 days ahead of schedule</a>, the ones that are<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/21/the-notcot-network-a-study-in-structured-user-generated-content/">first to comment on every techcrunch post</a>, and the ones that<span> </span><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/live_blogging_20.php">live blog every conference and seminar</a><span> </span>they attend.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><a style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: inherit; color: #286ea0; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.buzzgain.com/">BuzzGain</a><span> </span>tracks 1.7 Million “early adopters”, who frequently use (daily) about 4 Web2.0 applications and generate on average 1.7 posts daily (this is a big number BTW since the top users skew the numbers for the bottom of the list).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">So how do we get 100,000,000 entries from 85K users? The active users of friendfeed (at least 1 comment weekly) per usage and one entry (either a blog post or a tweet, or a flickr photo upload) is about 61%. The rest either opened an account and never did anything with it, or just set it up and “forgot it”. For the sake of this argument I am going to assume every friendfeed account as an “active one”.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">That works to about 1175 entries per user. Assuming they were live from Dec 2007 (or about 10 months), that works out to about ~117 entries per user per month. This is about 4 entries daily. So if you are an early adopter, you are blogging once daily, tweeting 2-4 times daily and maybe uploading photos once a week.<br style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;" /></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">The average # of tweets (which is the # 1 Web 2.0 application used by Friendfeed users) per early adopter per day is 9.2 (roughly 79% of friendfeed users have a twitter profile).</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">My question on the number 100,000,000 from Brett is “So WHAT”?</strong>.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">If every twitter user automatically posts their feed to friendfeed and that immediately constitutes an “entry” in friendfeed, why is that number even marginally useful?</p>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 18px; padding: 0px;">Unless its just there to show a big number for the sake of showing momentum. Which I suspect is the case.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://news.buzzgain.com/the-fat-head-of-friendfeed-statistics-buzzgain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
